arXiv, the preprint repository that became an independent nonprofit this summer, has introduced a hard cap on new paper submissions. Effective immediately, each submitter can file at most two new papers per calendar month and may have no more than three active submissions under review at any one time. Rejected papers count toward the monthly total, though multi-author papers only count against the person who uploads them, so large research groups are unlikely to feel the pinch.
arXiv says the move is a response to a flood of low-quality submissions, many produced with the help of AI tools. In September alone the site received 40,363 submissions, compared with 9,869 in the same month ten years ago and 20,569 two years ago. Moderators have seen a rise in 'thin' papers that are narrow in scope, as well as work broken into multiple smaller papers, much of it failing to meet arXiv's requirements for AI-assisted research, which mandate disclosure and a genuine contribution to the field.
According to arXiv's editorial advisory council chair, a small number of authors are submitting a large number of low-quality papers and consuming a disproportionate share of volunteer moderators' time, delaying legitimate submissions. The new limit is described as a stopgap while arXiv works out better long-term submission practices, and the organization says it will monitor the impact and adjust as needed.