Microsoft has been refused permission by the Court of Appeal to appeal to the UK Supreme Court in its long-running dispute with ValueLicensing over resale of pre-owned software licences. The refusal was issued without reasons, simply stating that the application is refused. The case stems from a 2021 lawsuit in which ValueLicensing sought £270 million, claiming Microsoft cut off the supply of surplus Office licences.
The November 2025 ruling had favoured ValueLicensing, allowing resale of pre-owned licences. Microsoft had said it would seek permission to appeal, but that request was rejected. Microsoft still has an option to apply directly to the Supreme Court within 28 days, though it would need to demonstrate why the Court of Appeal was wrong to refuse.
A recently published consent order adds pressure. It requires disclosure of documents from current and former Microsoft executives, including a 2013 internal presentation titled "Second-Hand Software Presentation," which the order describes as a "Known Adverse Document." The order also questions why Microsoft waited until late 2025 to disclose the document's existence. Separately, Alexander Wolfson, proposed class representative in a claim seeking £1.3 billion to £3.5 billion from Microsoft over similar conduct, is listed as an intervener on the appeal refusal.
Next steps include a witness statement from Microsoft explaining who knew what and when, followed by further disclosure. Both Microsoft and ValueLicensing declined to comment.