Constitution's Final Days and a Justice's Birth: A September Chronology
Reason's daily Supreme Court history posts mark the Constitution's completion, its signing, and the birth of Justice John Hessin Clarke on three consecutive September days.
Three consecutive entries in Reason's "Today in Supreme Court History" series highlight different milestones. On September 16, 1787, the Constitutional Convention finished its work on the document. The next day, September 17, the Constitution was signed, giving rise to Constitution Day.
The following day, September 18, 1857, marks the birth of John Hessin Clarke, who later served on the U.S. Supreme Court. The sources do not connect these events beyond their proximity in the calendar; they are separate historical notes from the same series.
Together, they illustrate the range of what the daily column covers—from the founding document to the people who later interpreted it.
Sources · 6
- Today in Supreme Court History: September 21, 1981
- Today in Supreme Court History: September 20, 1968
- Today in Supreme Court History: September 19, 1907
- Today in Supreme Court History: September 18, 1857
- Today in Supreme Court History: September 17, 1787
- Today in Supreme Court History: September 16, 1787
More in Law & Policy
Shadow Docket Now Outpaces Supreme Court’s Regular Docket, Report Says
A new analysis argues the Supreme Court’s emergency rulings have grown so common that the public should focus on the more transparent docket instead.
Federal Judge Finds MSNBC Pundit's Jan. 6 'Coaching' Tweet Not Negligent
A D.C. federal judge ruled that an MSNBC pundit's tweet accusing a lawyer of coaching a Jan. 6 hearing witness to lie did not meet the negligence standard for defamation.
Legal Marketing Roundup Highlights Branding and Leadership Lessons
A new Above the Law roundup collects recent legal marketing commentary, including takeaways from the LMA Second Chair Roundtable and a case for branding beyond visual identity.
Satirical Techdirt Piece Mocks Trump's Sniper Ammo Arch Claim
A Techdirt commentary uses satire to highlight the absurdity of a reported Trump proposal, reflecting on the state of political discourse.