In a recent essay on Reason's Volokh Conspiracy, the author examines fusionism, the political philosophy that seeks to unite libertarian and conservative principles. The essay argues that fusionism is far preferable to the competing ideologies of nationalism and postliberalism, but it does not give fusionism a clean bill of health.
The essay contends that fusionism has its own limitations. While it does not spell out these shortcomings in detail, it suggests they are significant enough to undermine the philosophy's coherence. The author also raises doubts about fusionism's political prospects, implying that it may struggle to gain traction in the current political climate.
The piece is notable for its even-handedness: it defends fusionism against its rivals while acknowledging its flaws. For readers interested in conservative and libertarian intellectual debates, the essay offers a nuanced take on a once-dominant coalition.