A recent Reason post by Eugene Volokh reports on a panel he joined with Nita Farahany of Duke Law School and Daniel Solove of George Washington University Law School. The panel debated the proper role of artificial intelligence in the creation and production of legal scholarship, and more broadly how AI may change the job of being a law professor.
The post frames the discussion around two questions: how AI should be used in producing legal scholarship, and how it might alter the professoriate. It does not, however, summarize the panelists' arguments or indicate whether they agreed on any point.
The source is an announcement rather than an analysis, so the only concrete information is the event's existence and participants. Readers seeking detailed positions would need to watch the linked video.