Legal Business Development: Qualify Prospects Like Dates
An Above the Law column argues that lawyers should apply dating-style screening to client development to avoid wasted time.
A recent Above the Law column suggests that lawyers looking for better clients and referral partners should borrow a tactic from the dating world: qualify people before investing time in them. The author argues that many professionals go into networking and business development without a clear sense of who is worth pursuing, leading to meetings that go nowhere.
The piece frames business development as a matching exercise rather than a numbers game. Just as a dater might screen for compatibility, values, and mutual interest, a lawyer should assess whether a prospective client or referral source is a good fit. That means being more deliberate about who gets a lunch slot or a follow-up call.
According to the column, the payoff is not just more business but better business—clients and partners who are aligned with the lawyer's practice. The advice is practical, if unconventional: treat professional relationships with the same care and selectivity as personal ones. The source is a single opinion piece, so the argument reflects the author's view rather than a broader industry consensus.
More in Law & Policy
Appeals Court Strikes Down ICE Detention Policy, Cites WWII Internment
A federal appeals court rejected an ICE detention policy and compared it to the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II.
Law Firm AI Marketing Still Carries Bar Complaint Risk
Treating marketing as a low-stakes place to use AI can still expose lawyers to professional discipline.
Trump Media's 50-Millisecond Feed Advantage Likely Unlawful, Law Professor Says
A Harvard Law professor argues that selling early access to President Trump's Truth Social posts lets traders profit on public information ahead of the public, unlike standard low-latency data feeds.
Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Optimism for the Supreme Court’s Future
Justice Jackson’s recent writings suggest a forward-looking faith in the Court’s evolution, despite current ideological divides.