Techdirt has published a critical take on Meta's settlement with US states, arguing that the deal is far from the industry-changing "Big Tobacco" moment some have framed it as. According to the outlet, the settlement is better understood as Meta's attempt to shape how the rest of the internet gets regulated, rather than a genuine concession or accountability measure.
The analysis leans on an op-ed by Eric Goldman, which Techdirt republished, to argue that the settlement is anti-competitive. The piece also contends that the deal is bad for kids, though it does not go into further detail in the excerpt provided. The overall thrust is that the settlement gives Meta outsized influence over future internet rules while doing little to address the harms it claims to address.
Since this is a single source, there are no differing perspectives to compare. The article is explicitly opinionated, and its claims about the settlement's motivations and effects are presented as analysis rather than established fact.