A federal appeals court has rejected limits on border searches of cell phones, according to a Reason column published September 18, 2026. The piece is an opinion essay, and its headline and subhead make the author's position clear: the Second Circuit's decision is wrong, and the Supreme Court should take up the matter.
The column argues that the court should not have allowed border searches of cell phones to proceed without the limits the author believes are necessary. It frames the ruling as a mistaken outcome that requires correction by the nation's highest court.
Because this is a single opinion piece, it offers no opposing viewpoints or additional reporting. It is best read as an argument for why the Supreme Court should intervene in this area of law.