Federal Circuit Grants Mandamus, Moves USC v. Google Out of Albright's Court
The ruling shifts a patent case from the Western District of Texas to Northern California, weeks after Judge Albright's departure.
AI regulation, litigation, copyright and IP, and privacy law.
The ruling shifts a patent case from the Western District of Texas to Northern California, weeks after Judge Albright's departure.
In a Lawfare interview, Audrey Tang argues that participatory AI governance only works when assemblies inform—not replace—legislative bodies.
A federal court has ruled that warrantless searches of Flock's automated license plate reader database violate the Fourth Amendment, though the decision lacks precedential force.
The case tests whether the 1980 Refugee Act lets people who lost asylum status still become permanent residents despite criminal convictions.
The Supreme Court seems likely to affirm dismissal of an ERISA suit against Intel fiduciaries, demanding that plaintiffs compare similar investment strategies.
A morning docket highlights three legal policy developments: a Cornell investigation, a DOJ secrecy fight, and a move in Judge Newman's case.
A federal magistrate judge approves a filing extension while rebuking the parties for squandering time on trivial disputes.
A state appeals court halted enforcement of Minnesota's law against nudification apps, underscoring that even harmful speech requires carefully tailored regulation.
A new critique argues that Biglaw's push to recruit first-year law students before they learn core legal concepts is a self-inflicted problem with real costs for students.
The long-running dispute over the 98-year-old judge's fitness moves to a new judicial council, but the record does not show who requested the transfer.
A new Techdirt report says the Trump administration is formally prioritizing white South Africans for entry while continuing broad deportation efforts.
A reported Department of Justice directive would require lawyers to call artificial intelligence 'SI,' a change critics see as pandering to President Trump.
A Fifth Circuit judge’s published gripe about promotion speculation may amplify the criticism it sought to rebut.
An Above the Law podcast episode offers guidance on how companies can establish foundational legal operations.
Hélène Landemore argues that ordinary citizens, not just officials and experts, should help set AI's purpose and limits through deliberative assemblies.
The sole source is a promotional deal for Salesforce certification prep, offering no legal or regulatory analysis.
Lawfare analysts argue that US chip export controls and proposed AI safety deals with China conflict, and suggest removing throttling to secure a pacing agreement.
Justice Samuel Alito is not retiring, but his remarks frame the next election as a referendum on the Court's conservative majority.