Why Are Taxpayers Charged for Trump's Luxuries?
An Above the Law commentary questions the use of public money for Trump's personal expenses, raising legal and policy concerns.
AI regulation, litigation, copyright and IP, and privacy law.
An Above the Law commentary questions the use of public money for Trump's personal expenses, raising legal and policy concerns.
Freshly obtained documents reveal additional hardline immigration policies from the White House adviser, deepening concerns over their impact.
A new Lawfare analysis maps where U.S. export controls can and cannot reduce risks from open-weight AI, arguing broad restrictions face legal and practical obstacles.
New open-source policies for teen self-harm content propose age-banded rules and a four-zone response framework to help platforms enforce child safety at scale.
A federal judge ruled that vandalizing a national monument is neither free expression nor religious exercise under the First Amendment or RFRA.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court suspended attorney Stephanie Rapkin for spitting on a teenage protester and client misconduct, while a separate settlement awarded her $760,000 over a warrantless police entry.
An industry discussion highlights how legal teams are moving beyond contract lifecycle management toward agentic AI that orchestrates complex workflows.
A Reason analysis separates Nazi economic statism from socialist egalitarianism, noting the gap narrows in practice.
A new Lawfare Daily episode convenes policy experts to assess how a changing AI risk climate is shaping domestic and foreign policy.
The agency's advance notice could lead to formal requirements for social media, search engines, and other ad platforms that facilitate impersonation fraud.
Counterterrorism researchers warn that widely available 'abliterated' AI models, stripped of safety guardrails, are becoming a practical tool for extremist planning and encouragement.
The use of a personal Gmail account to postpone an official USPTO celebration raises new questions about federal records compliance.
A Techdirt column argues that Microsoft's latest Xbox layoffs reflect a broader breakdown of trust in institutional promises.
A Techdirt commentary sees hypocrisy in the silence of critics who once decried a DHS 'ministry of truth' after Trump reportedly ordered the FCC to punish a reporter.
A SCOTUSblog follow-up finds the justices remained busy through the 2026 summer recess.
A SCOTUSblog analysis argues that the right to pursue one's profession is rooted in Founding-era state constitutions and that Williamson v. Lee Optical was wrongly decided.
New patent claims from Texas, UCSF, Siemens, and a London startup could shape who controls mind-reading technology.
EPIC asks a federal judge to declare DHS actions unlawful, accusing DOJ delays of abetting voter suppression.