In an opinion essay for STAT, Reed Jobs argues that the National Institutes of Health should receive $100 billion per year. He frames this as a necessary strengthening of the agency, writing that investment in the NIH should be increased rather than cut.
The essay is a single-source opinion piece, so it does not present competing views or detailed budget breakdowns. Its central claim is that a larger NIH budget would better support the agency's mission, though the piece does not specify how the additional funds should be allocated.
Because this is an opinion piece, it represents one viewpoint in an ongoing policy debate rather than an official proposal or legislative plan. The $100 billion figure is the author's recommendation, not an enacted budget.