Academics who use AI in their work are often nervous to admit it, according to a new study highlighted by Nieman Lab. The research, titled "Guidance over guidelines?," finds that a lack of clear professional standards around AI leaves scholars feeling uncertain and even ashamed of their practices.
The study draws a parallel to journalists, who face similar anxieties about using AI tools. Without explicit guidance from institutions, individuals are left to guess what is acceptable, and many worry that admitting to AI use could discredit their work or invite criticism from superiors.
This "AI shame" appears to stem not from the act of using AI itself, but from the absence of shared norms. The researchers suggest that institutions need to move beyond vague principles and provide concrete, practical guidance to help professionals navigate AI use openly and confidently.