The article from Rest of World describes a growing practice: AI companies pay highly educated professionals to impart the nuanced judgment they built over years of experience. These workers are not just feeding data — they are teaching models how to make decisions in complex, real-world situations.
But the workers interviewed for the piece understand the irony. By refining the very systems that could automate their roles, they are potentially undermining their own job security. The source notes that this dynamic is deliberate: companies need expert knowledge to make AI credible, even as that same knowledge becomes less exclusive.
There is no disagreement in the source — it is a single narrative. The tension is internal, not between different viewpoints. The article frames this as a quiet but profound shift in how expertise is valued: what was once a career skill becomes a temporary input for a machine.