The source is a single item: Tom Gauld's weekly cartoon in New Scientist, titled 'Tom Gauld on the real risks of AI'. As a cartoon, it makes its point through humour rather than analysis, and the text provides no description of the actual drawing. The title alone signals a satirical take on how AI risk is discussed.
Gauld's work often uses deadpan illustration to deflate grand pronouncements, and the title suggests a similar move here: contrasting the 'real' risks of AI with the more dramatic, often exaggerated ones that dominate headlines. The joke likely lands on the mundane or ironic gap between what people fear and what actually happens.
Because the source is a single cartoon with no accompanying article, there is no data, expert quote, or factual claim to verify. The significance is in the framing: a prominent science publication using humour to ask which AI risks deserve attention. No other sources are available for comparison, so this stands alone as a cultural artefact rather than a reported story.